Please. It’d be nice to get to the point where the US stops funding Israel’s genocide.

i guess bibi just hates jews, arabs and everyone else equally — just as dtrump, pupin, xi and co. do… Also i assume by typing “america” here you pointing on fsb-infiltrated 🍊 fuckface and it’s supporters, not on states’ citizens as whole, since only ultra[any direction] brainrot junk classifies people solely by the fact to which social group they’re belonging. Basically, this mechanism works on global scale now, it’s input and output of every “independent” modern country. Like there’s a formal leader, who’s main purpose is to make or rather force other countries’ citizens to hate citizens under his jurisdiction (by stimulating them to do shit towards others). Then, using this accumulated hatred, they release war hounds and extermination overpumped by hatred begins. It may be each country against all other or alliances vs alliances. But this external hatred is not kinda enough according to them, so they also actively stimulate division among people within each country. Then a brave new world of ignorance comes out of bloodshed with words like “peace”, “equality”, “mercy”, “forgiveness”, “ethics”, “morality”, “literally_anything_good_hood”, etc. coming from every corner and every shithole. There are just less people and not much clue on da fuck have happened. Lives that can’t be restored, wasted time that can’t be regained. Ah, also this mentioned “genocide”. It’ll be nice to remember that it’s not the only extermination occuring in modern world. And it’s not even full scale, bruh. Imagine shit that’ll happen when genocide areas of different empires will start to intersect each other. Oof 🗿 like big one oooofff and then only wasteland — no people, no animals, no plants, no signs of life on shapeless ruins of something that… was. Probably something alike already happened/is happening, but right now nothing specific comes to my mind really, so think yourself if needed

i guess bibi just hates jews, arabs and everyone else equally — just as dtrump, pupin, xi and co. do… Also i assume by typing “america” here you pointing on fsb-infiltrated 🍊 fuckface and it’s supporters, not on states’ citizens as whole, since only brainrot junk classifies people solely by the fact to which social group they’re belonging Basically, this mechanism works on global scale now, it’s input and output of every “independent” modern country. Like there’s a leader, who’s main purpose is to make or rather force other countries’ citizens to hate citizens under his jurisdiction (by stimulating them to do shit towards others). Then, using this accumulated hatred, they release war hounds and extermination overpumped by hatred begins. It may be each country against all other or alliances vs alliances. But this external hatred is not kinda enough according to them, so they also stimulate division among people within each country. Then a brave new world of ignorance comes out with words like “peace”, “equality”, “mercy”, “forgiveness”, “ethics”, “morality”, “literally_anything_good_hood”, etc. coming from every corner and every shithole. There are just less people and not much clue on da fuck have happened. Lives that can’t be restored, wasted time that can’t be regained.

Of course, we can call out the Soviet atrocities, but credit to the superhuman sacrifices they made and snatching victory from the jaws of defeat despite being back stabbed and caught on the wrong footing by the Germans. The thing is with World War II is that it’s a fight between evil and lesser evil. The Allies were objectively less bad, even though they had colonies and committed heinous acts in the previous 400 years of colonisation and even during the war. A joke in Tropico videogame sums up the meta-nature of the belligerents in World War 2 when you are forced to take sides: “One is bombing civilians. The other-- is evil.”

Because they didn’t refuse, they took too long. Britain wasn’t taking it seriously, because they assumed they had all the time in the world, so they used the slow boats over planes for communication - after all it’s not like the USSR was going to ally with the Nazi’s or anything. And France naively took a backseat and let England do all the talking because they were still too weak after WW1 to really care, even if they were more keen on the alliance. It all fell apart because the Soviets felt they weren’t really committed and the Allies felt it was too demanding.

Likewise the French had earlier entered into a mutual assistance pact with the Soviets in 1935 , but this failed due to how conditional it was and became largely symbolic of nothing.

There’s a lot to fault Britain and France for in regards to the talks, but to say they refused is in bad faith.

Also notice how they never mention that the point of the “pact” was that the eastern half stays polish, but since the polish government fled south out of Poland, the polish state was de facto no more. The USSR afterwards waited two weeks before going in and securing the line.

France and USSR actually signed “some kind” of mutual assistance agreement against Nazi Germany before the war started. Emphasis on “some kind” because the agreement wasn’t binding and very vague on when and how should they assist with each other.