chasteinsect@programming.dev to Linux@programming.devEnglish · 1 month agoWhat Have I Learned From Daily Driving Arch Linux For Three Years?thelibre.newsexternal-linkmessage-square19linkfedilinkarrow-up150
arrow-up150external-linkWhat Have I Learned From Daily Driving Arch Linux For Three Years?thelibre.newschasteinsect@programming.dev to Linux@programming.devEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square19linkfedilink
minus-squareDataprolet@lemmy.dbzer0.comBannedlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up24·1 month agoRolling release distros are not unstable.
minus-squareDumhuvud@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·1 month agoThe term “stable” is not meant to be used as a synonym for “reliable” when describing distros.
minus-squareDataprolet@lemmy.dbzer0.comBannedlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 month agoI know, I was referring to the heading implying otherwise: It turned out to be more stable than I expected.
minus-squareVictor@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month agoDepends on your definition of “reliable” 😉
minus-squarePokerChips@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 month agoMaybe you’re right. But arch is stable.
Rolling release distros are not unstable.
The term “stable” is not meant to be used as a synonym for “reliable” when describing distros.
I know, I was referring to the heading implying otherwise:
Depends on your definition of “reliable” 😉
Maybe you’re right. But arch is stable.