• Archangel1313@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Why would the right get behind this idea? They don’t want the government investing in anything. They just want private companies to assume the entire burden, and offload the expense directly onto the consumer.

    • SolacefromSilence@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      No, that’s what they say they want. In practice, they give government resources away or turn a blind eye to rising rates for whatever company gives them campaign contributions.

    • toofpic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      What burden? It’s not burden, it’s sales. A switch to renewables means your loss on investments in producing and delivering gas and benzene. So you protect yourself by lobbying laws that won’t allow anyone to “get the energy out of the thin air”

  • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 days ago

    The problem is the right care more about hurting their perceived enemies than they do actually improving their own lives.

  • MrMakabar@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 days ago

    The right wants to keep and strengthen hierarchy. The problem with renewables is that they are much harder to control. Solar can be installed on the roofs, balconies and the like, which can be done by a lot of people. So hard to control. Even wind turbines can be easily built by a village or other larger group, like a rich farmer. Compared that to a gas power plant, which takes millions in investment or even more so a nuclear power plant, where we are talking billions. That is also true for things like EVs, which can be charged at home using solar.

    There is a lifestyle where you own your own home, have some solar on the roof, charge an EV with it and have a garden producing some food. That is like 2/3 of a normal persons budget. So if you can work a bit to make ends means, that can create a lot of freedom. Especially if it is self employed job and considering that your basic needs are mostly covered that risk is acceptable. That sort of population would be a nightmare to control in a hierarchy.

  • CodingCarpenter@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    No they wouldn’t. Prices only go up they never go down. The utility would tack on a charge to help pay for whatever green solution they’ve used. Then the price will remain stable. It might remain stable longer than usual but it absolutely will not go down