• Hello_there@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    7 days ago

    If you want to make heat, start up a gaming PC. At least the energy will go to doing something before it gets turned to heat.

    • HexadecimalSky@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      7 days ago

      I legitimately had to buy a heater after I stopped regularly using my desktop because it was what was keeping my room warm.

      • motor_spirit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        running FFXI and later WoW on my first rig (many moons ago) allowed me to keep my room nice and balmy all winter, to the point where I’d leave a window open for much of the day during snow-supporting temps and it’d still be toasty

    • jcs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      I don’t have a source handy, but someone attempted to heat their apartment with computers and ended up spending something like >$1000 in utilities that month.

      • Hello_there@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        Resistive heat is expensive - that’s why heat pumps are so good.
        In practice, they would have gotten identical results with any electric resistive heater. Fans, oil filled, ceramic, etc. all largely doesn’t matter as it is Wh of electricity to Wh of heat.

      • kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        They must have overshot, then. Computers are 100% efficient space heaters that produce math as a byproduct.

        • copd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          in the uk price per kWh for electricity is over five times cost of natural gas. We all use natural gas boilers to heat water which flows through radiators to warm our rooms. Anybody who heats their house with space heaters is just throwing money away whether it’s 100% efficient or not.

          You see more heatpumps these days but that’s another thing entirely

          • kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 days ago

            Heat pumps cap out at about 250% 400% efficiency, so you’d still be spending more to run them than to burn natural gas at that ratio.

            • spidermanchild@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              7 days ago

              Heat pumps easily exceed 2.5 COP. More like 4 in the UK climate. And gas isn’t 100% efficient either. But yeah it’s a wash or can be more expensive to heat with heat pumps where electricity is really expensive. It helps if we all conveniently ignore externalities like pollution and carbon too.

              • kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                7 days ago

                Thanks for the correction, edited. How is gas not 100% efficient, though?

                But yeah, heat pumps are definitely more environmentally friendly (unless you’re habitually letting the refrigerant out, o guess). The real argument is whether the extra energy is worth it for protein folding (I’d say generally no, but if you don’t have a heat pump, might as well).