New design sets a high standard for post-quantum readiness.

  • OrganicMustard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Having in mind we are not even close to breaking classical cryptography with quantum computing I doubt this was their best investment of time

    • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 days ago

      There are nation states just straight up intercepting and storing signal data on their networks in hopes that it can be decrypted in the future. 20 year old messages will still be useful.

    • ExLisperA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s future-proofing. It means my messages are not only safe today but, even if they are intercepted or leaked somehow, will also be safe in the future.

    • OrganicMustard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Lol, it shows the hype quantum computing has sold and how detached the public thought is about it from reality.

      I’m friends with two quantum computing researchers and they are pretty sure quantum computing will never be a practical application because of how the noise and errors scale with the system size.

      • L501@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        The quantum computing hype is really annoying but we don’t know the future. One day there might be a breakthrough in noise reduction. I’d rather signal have post-quantum cryptography and not need it than get blindsided if there is suddenly a qc that can break rsa with shor. Not to mention intelligence agencies doing store now/decrypt later stuff.