ExLisper Site
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
kinther@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 4 months ago

"Trump is trying to collapse our economy": War on "woke" revealed as a war on all Americans

www.salon.com

external-link
message-square
43
fedilink
0
external-link

"Trump is trying to collapse our economy": War on "woke" revealed as a war on all Americans

www.salon.com

kinther@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 4 months ago
message-square
43
fedilink
"Trump is trying to collapse our economy": The "war on woke" is revealed as a war on all Americans
www.salon.com
external-link
The Christian nationalists behind the federal spending "pause" want to punish everyone, not just "blue" America
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • libertyforever@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    War on all Americans? Trump won the election and has good approval ratings.

    • toomanypancakes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Good approval ratings with who? From what I’ve seen his approval ratings with Americans are almost as terrible as they were last time.

      • libertyforever@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Various pollsters.

        https://www.realclearpolling.com/polls/approval/donald-trump/approval-rating

    • Sabin10@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      That doesn’t mean that what he’s doing is good for Americans, it just means Americans don’t understand the consequences or don’t care.

      • libertyforever@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I have seen a lot of comments these days that voters are stupid, or something equivalent. I suppose that is all the Democrats got at this point.

        • mrbeano@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          But there are way, way more comments, posts, and articles about how he’s reneged on his promises & will continue to hurt people for the sake of hurting people… In the face of authoritarianism, you’re worried about decorum?

          • libertyforever@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Based on his current approval rating, he is doing what he promised to do, which won him the election.

            • FinnFooted@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              This is the most garbage logic. His approval rating does not directly equate to fulfilling promises. There can be cause and effect, but it’s not guaranteed especially when there’s so many factors that impact approval rating.

              Presidents get a post election bump. It has nothing to do with fuffiling policy promises. Hell, the bump began before he took office, so obviously it has little to do with him fulfilling promises. Trump had a bump his first term too. But guess what. Literally every other president, including Biden, had a better overall approval rating at the beginning of a term than trump ever has. Time will tell where his approval lands.

              • libertyforever@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                There is never going to be a perfect metric on fulfilling campaign promises. The approval rating is a very good metric for that. Did someone said this is perfect metric?

                Trump was acting more like the sitting president than Biden between election and inauguration. Of course that can result in a bump. For example, the Israel Hamas ceasefire. Trump was critical in getting that deal done even though he was not a sitting president at the time.

                Your logic was very bad.

                • FinnFooted@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  I didn’t say it wasn’t even and imperfect metric. I’m saying that its almost no metric. Perhaps even evidence of poor performance to be honest. Because the approval bump is a repeatable and measurable phenomenon we observe after every election that has 0 to do with presidential policy or action. And his post election approval bump is the second worst in history, only below his own poor approval bump from his first term.

                  Information is relative to the environment and circumstances. Is doesn’t exist in a vacuum.

        • Sabin10@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          American voters are stupid, that’s what conservative politicians have been working towards with 50 years of education budget cuts.

          • libertyforever@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            This is a losing argument for Democrats.

            • Sabin10@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              You seem to think I’m American. That’s cute.

              • libertyforever@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                Wrong. I didn’t think that. Perhaps reread what I wrote.

    • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      30% is not good approval ratings.

      That’s less than the 34% he had when Biden took the Presidency from him.

      • libertyforever@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Why are you looking at 2021? We have updated info from various pollsters.

        https://www.realclearpolling.com/polls/approval/donald-trump/approval-rating

        • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          January 20, 2025

          • libertyforever@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            I am not sure which exact number you were looking. Anyway, you want to look at multiple polls if it is there. I provided the link.

            • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              Updated Jan. 29, 2025, at 5:38 PM

              This is more accurate.

              • libertyforever@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                I think you meant this one.

                https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/approval/donald-trump/

                • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  No.

politics @lemmy.world

politics@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !politics@lemmy.world

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 1.46K users / day
  • 3.17K users / week
  • 5.61K users / month
  • 9.08K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 23.9K subscribers
  • 2.44K Posts
  • 19.4K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • outrageousmatter@lemmy.world
  • aidan@lemmy.world
  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
  • 🌱 🐄🌱 @lemmy.world
  • Theonetheycall1845@lemmy.world
  • JuBe@lemmy.world
  • Lasherz@lemmy.world
  • BE: 0.19.10
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org