Nearly a third of Americans – 30% – say people may have to resort to violence in order to get the country back on track, according to the latest PBS News/NPR/Marist poll.

It’s a sharp rise from 18 months ago, when 19% of Americans said the same.

  • AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    3 days ago

    Can you afford not to get paid for 2 weeks? If so you’re in the minority. Most people can’t. Not to mention they have kids they are worried about, medical conditions that they can barely afford even with insurance. Rising housing and grocery costs. Etc…

    I’m not trying to be a downer. I would love to see this happen, but we need a “realistic” way to accomplish it, to convince a majority to participate.

    • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Unions build up strike-funds with membership dues so that members can continue to receive a salary while striking, that’s why unions are so essential for working class people to be able to flex their power non-violently.

      Consider that Chile is a much less wealthy country than the US. but was able to successfully commit to a general strike for over a month.

        • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          32
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          I’m familiar with the depressing statistic already, a little under 10%.

          However, bear in mind that the majority of the most critical infrastructure for making profit, such as ports, trains, trucking, and medical care have the highest rates of unionized jobs, and would still be incredibly effective for a general strike (Generally only 3.5% of the population would need to participate to have a meaningful effect). Even with our abyssal rate of unionization, we still hold incredible leverage if we choose to use it.

          The UAW has a general strike planned for May 1st 2028, which has real odds of working. Unfortunately it’s still 2 years out, and by that time may be too late. I’m hoping it’s moved up at some point.

    • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      3 days ago

      Wrong way of thinking, buddy boy.

      If you can’t afford to go without pay for 2 weeks now, then where do you think you’ll be in 2 years time?

      Act now while you’re breathing, for the sake of being able to breathe.

    • krashmo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      Can they afford to live under a fascist dictatorship that crushes dissenters and disappears citizens at will? It seems that by “realistic” resistance you mean “without inconvenience” but we’re never going to get to that point. That seems to be what people are hoping for and it just doesn’t work that way. The longer we wait the more sacrifice will be required.

          • AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            What? What are you talking about? If enough people don’t participate then it won’t make a difference. And you’re asking if they would still participate if it costs too much?? I’m sure many people would love to join but feel due to their current circumstances that they can’t. That demo of people is being overlooked and shit on for some stupid reason.

    • Taldan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      Can you afford not to get paid for 2 weeks? If so you’re in the minority. Most people can’t.

      The general strike is being planned for almost 3 years out. We would have to save less than 2% of our paycheck to more than cover 2 weeks without being paid. We need to normalize preparing for a general strike, and be willing to help each other if needed when the time comes

    • MasterBlaster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Perhaps this is why trump just declared war on nonprofits. They could potentially pull together resources to keep people fed during a coordinated nationwide strike.

      They in general exist to tackle goals directly opposed to fascist regimes, so it males sense to target them.

      Education, social justice, feeding the hungry, and protecting nature are all examples of goals Trump’s regime are staunchly against.

      • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        That’s why mutual aid organizations are essential. They operate outside of the legal system, so can’t be directly targeted as easily. If you or anyone else reading this have the time, please consider joining your local mutual aid group. That could be Food Not Bombs, a different group local to your city or town, or even your local church if you’re in a rural area.

        If you don’t have one in your area, start one! Here’s a little guide on how and where to find likeminded folk to start one with: https://infosec.exchange/@tinker/113589807117870451

    • brachiosaurus@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Can you afford not to get paid for 2 weeks? If so you’re in the minority. Most people can’t.

      Let’s be honest most people living in first world countries can indeed do that but they don’t like to renounce to all the commodities they have.