Unfortunately that’s not how the law works in regards to chilling free speech, simply threatening and that threat having an outcome is a guest amendment violation. The fact they paid so they didn’t have to deal with a psychopath in the mean time while they flight it on the backend as the law provides and intends is just the smart legal way to deal with it and achieve the same outcome. That’s ignoring the fact you can sue for interest for unlawful impactful takings under imminent domain.
It’s nice that said that.
Unfortunately that’s not how the law works in regards to chilling free speech, simply threatening and that threat having an outcome is a guest amendment violation. The fact they paid so they didn’t have to deal with a psychopath in the mean time while they flight it on the backend as the law provides and intends is just the smart legal way to deal with it and achieve the same outcome. That’s ignoring the fact you can sue for interest for unlawful impactful takings under imminent domain.