Huh. I thought this was already perfectly optimized?

  • Jhex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    6 days ago

    Performance ‘Our Top Priority,’ Gearbox Says

    Really? I thought we were to either suck it up or move on… I moved on

  • Technotica@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    6 days ago

    What now it’s a priority? What about Pitchfords snobbish comments? Did their bottom line hurt?

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      Something I’ve kinda come to accept about Gearbox is that Pitchford is an ass and sometimes they farm out products when they shouldn’t (ACM bring the biggest example), but most of the devs actually working on the games really do care about the product and want it to be good.

      • TrousersMcPants@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        Gearbox would be a much more beloved company if Randy Pitchford fucked off. He makes everything they do worse, like bragging about how terrible Duke Nukem Forever was like the company is proud of killing the franchise.

  • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 days ago

    It’s not just stutters but also just general poor performance in the open world, such that I get about half the frame rate I would expect to see on high settings without frame gen. I wouldn’t be surprised if the optimizations here are like what happened with Assassin’s Creed: Unity where there was a bunch of detail that got sanded off of the world map in places that a player should never actually see it anyway.