I dont like this nonsense. They never tell you what constitutes a chirp, is it chirp chirp? Is it each chirp cause that means its 140°. Like have you ever tried to actually use this in RL? It simply doesn’t work.
Its for a very specific region and a very particular cricket. So its bullshit to pass it off like some natural law
Well there is no standard, most crickets chirp different and at different speeds its not working in most places, so it narrows the observation not study really down to next to useless and an occasional huh look correlation, youre just the guy that believed it without thought and hasn’t traveled at ALL, or applied themselves to thinking outside their dogmatic-ass-box apparently.
I dont like this nonsense. They never tell you what constitutes a chirp, is it chirp chirp? Is it each chirp cause that means its 140°. Like have you ever tried to actually use this in RL? It simply doesn’t work.
Its for a very specific region and a very particular cricket. So its bullshit to pass it off like some natural law
You’re telling me you cant keep track of 30-45 simple chirps off a standard reference cricket in a 15 second period? Did you even go to school dude?
That depends on whether it’s a frictionless sphere.
Fuck
Well there is no standard, most crickets chirp different and at different speeds its not working in most places, so it narrows the observation not study really down to next to useless and an occasional huh look correlation, youre just the guy that believed it without thought and hasn’t traveled at ALL, or applied themselves to thinking outside their dogmatic-ass-box apparently.
Maybe you should read a book friend.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Counting the negative chirps is the worst. Like, why is there a -20ch marker if it’s never -20?