• barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    3 days ago

    It’s so obvious that this was deliberate market manipulation from the beginning. People seem to forget that he’s done this monthly since his innauguration. Its like its his menstrual cycle or something.

    Only a corrupt president could do this type of market manipulation, so of course he would exploit that opportumity ruthlessly.

    And this isn’t the last time, he will do it again. He announced a 90 day pause, so maybe he’s going to slow it down, since this one got so hot it threatened to boil over.

      • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        3 days ago

        How is that mysogynistic? Men know about female biology, too, you know, and we’re allowed to refer to it. Nothing I said was disparaging toward women, it was simply an observation that his cyclical market manipulation is as inexorable as another human cycle. It was a metaphor, not a judgement on women.

        If I could have thought of a male biological cycle that would have fit the metaphor, I might have, but I dont know of one that would work as well.

        So, now you are stalking me, so you can call me out everytime I recognize that females roam the Earth? Grow the fuck up.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      Plausible deniability - there was a public recommendation by a stable genius. Maybe people read his media site and follow his recommendations. Stranger things are happening every day

      And orangeboi made himself above the law

    • mkwt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      Insider trading is where the one doing the trade has insider information. This “tweet” (“Truth”?) cannot be insider information by definition.

      Could Trump administration figures do insider trading on the basis of more explicit insider information? Absolutely. Does this message prove any of that? No.

  • Archangel@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    3 days ago

    “It was a prescient call by the president. Maybe too prescient”

    It’s not “prescience” when it’s deliberate.