In a way, erotic art is what touches humans the deepest (hehe), just raw biological neuron activation. That‘s another reason why kids under 16 should be banned from any internet platform: It ruins both the magical childhood that children are supposed to have, and if you accommodate for them being online, it just ruins the internet for any adult wanting to share their art or discussing NSFW (stupid abbrev. btw) topics.
Thank you for coming to my TED talk!
under 16
Kids under 16 being banned because “sex bad” is dumb. A kid who is seeking out porn is mature enough to handle it. Part if “the magic of childhood” used to be finding your uncle’s stash of nudie mags.
That‘s different from stumbling upon hardcore BDSM porn and being groomed and radicalized by failed discord mindset coaches. If the playboy mags from back then had IRA propaganda and neonazi meeting invitations in them, those mags would‘ve been completely banned. You can‘t do that with the internet, so atleast make children not have to deal with this troubled reality before their brain has evolved enough.
Sex sells. Simple as.
Don’t be so crass vulgar and demeaning.
Squishy tits and hard abs and throbbing cocks and flapping labia inspire.
You’re right, I shouldn’t have brought commerce into this discussion of art. [Tone indicator:Genuine]
I don’t get this one
NSFW art often gets disproportionate attention (likes and reblogs pouring out of the pot) compared with SFW art.
One requires impulse control. The other uh, doesn’t
I get the point of the comic but the third panel makes no sense
