250 million miles across 15k cars is an average of less than 17k miles each. With no additional context as to the age of the cars or distribution of miles across the fleet, this number is largely meaningless. Regardless, that 1.5% figure is not as great as they want you to think.
It’s 225 battery failures at avg 17K miles. As affordability goes, it’s hardly an attractive stat for the average income earner where paying off and for a car is quite a big deal.
But, for all we know, those 255 cars had 980k miles each and the rest had 0. Or they all had 0 miles and caught fire right off the factory line while the rest of the batteries never died.
Put more realistically, it could be that almost no cars needed a battery replacement until they hit 200k miles or 15 years old or whatever. If that were the case, it’s a pretty good number. But they didn’t provide enough data to know if that’s the case, or if all of their cars are 2 years old, lightly driven, and they’ve already had 255 failures. I could see either scenario being true.
It’s 225 battery failures at avg 17K miles. As affordability goes, it’s hardly an attractive stat for the average income earner where paying off and for a car is quite a big deal.
We’ll get there, though.
But, for all we know, those 255 cars had 980k miles each and the rest had 0. Or they all had 0 miles and caught fire right off the factory line while the rest of the batteries never died.
Put more realistically, it could be that almost no cars needed a battery replacement until they hit 200k miles or 15 years old or whatever. If that were the case, it’s a pretty good number. But they didn’t provide enough data to know if that’s the case, or if all of their cars are 2 years old, lightly driven, and they’ve already had 255 failures. I could see either scenario being true.