• bigpEE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      6 months ago

      This is just saying that the glial cells help make this less bad than it could be, no? Nothing about why neurons behind receptors would be worse

      • canihasaccount@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        No, glia support neurons; they do things like redirecting blood flow to more-active-than-usual neurons, mylenate axons, etc. They wouldn’t form a mesh around neurons’ photoreceptors the same way they do neurons’ somas and axons. What the article describes is that glia actually are critical at allowing for color vision during the day and night vision at night, since on land we’d get too much blue light to see color with much fidelity were it not for glia, and a similar filtration process helps us see at night. It’s not that it’s not as bad as it could be, it’s actually that vision is better this way (barring one small blind spot outside of our fovea–which, being outside of the fovea, would have low acuity anyways).

        • bigpEE@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Couldn’t a neurons-behind-eyes human just have fewer blue receptors? Or a brain that attenuates the blue signal?

          • canihasaccount@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Blue light is important for night vision, so either of those options would lead to less of an ability to see well after sunset.

  • gedaliyah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    6 months ago

    ✅ Discount number of limbs

    ✅ Cheaply made eyeballs

    ✅ Held together with a bunch of inflexible bones

    Wait, am I just an off-band octopus?

    Damn.

  • Rachelhazideas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Quick way to find your blindspot:

    1. Close your right eye

    2. Hold your phone/monitor 1ft (30cm) away from your face

    3. Look at the ‘x’ below with your left eye

    4. Slowly bring your phone towards you (or your face towards the monitor) until the ‘.’ disappears

      .                                                                           x
      
    • jsomae@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      The . is not visible to me at any distance without taking my eyes off the x

        • Jax@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          Ọ̶͍̖͇̔ù̷̡̗̠͚̤̲͆̆͆̈́̒͂̑̇̈͆r̶͔͔̘̣̪̻̽͆͗ ̶̡̢̢̠͈̲̪̜̘͔͇̟͐̒̑̿͐̈́͌̾̌͐̌̂̃̐͜ͅͅt̷̛̻̫̺́̈͂̓̊̔̈́̈́̀į̶̨͔̣̣̫͖̭̀̏͂̈́́̅̀̂̐̚͘͜͝m̴͇̘̼̻͔͍͚̍̏̽͛̋͛̃͠ͅe̶̜͌̾͒͒́̽ ̶̣̙̻̪͓̒͊̍a̵̭͔̝̣̙̠͇͎͈̺͋̈̇̓͐́̆̈́̈́͐̚ͅp̷̪̮̯̗̰̮̣̩̭̎̓̃̓̚̕͜͠ͅp̷̢̡̙͙̯̹̪͚̘͙̯̰̏͜ř̴̦͎̓͐̄̈́̽̔̇̈́̚̕͝͠o̴̢͍̘̹͎̹͝a̷͙̻̹̯̭̲̩̅̀͆͊̂̏̕̕͝c̴̮̎͑͛͝͝h̵̢͙͇̣͒͒̊̀̕̕͜ė̶̛͇̈́̈́̀͊̈́͛͋̊͂͗̀͋̒ş̵̧̛̘͙̬̯̰͎̖͇͚͖͂̅̔͋͋̏̏͘̕͝͝͝ ̷̢͍̺̣͉̬̹̣̲̪̽͒̏̆̄̆̂͗̒͐̃͛̚b̴̪̤͉̯̲̦̒̊̉͆͑̀̌̊̕r̴̢̢̺̬̜̦̘̪̅͌̐̓̎́̈́̋̈́͛̑̒͘ò̶̳̼̯̻͕͖̹̖̔͜͠t̵̛̖̫͓͎͚̙̀̂̀̃͛̎̅̌̆̇̚̚͠͝h̶͓̟̻̫̲͚͂̇̐e̶̩̻̗͎͎̞͇̠͎̦̊͗͝ȑ̷̢͕̣̳̪

      • Rachelhazideas@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Make sure to keep your left eye looking at the ‘x’ the whole time. The ‘.’ should only be in your peripheral vision.

        • Jax@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          It’s in my peripheral and it never disappears, I had no issue understanding the instructions.

    • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Lol, at first glance I thought this was a poster for some new movie. All we need to do is change the font of “Cephalopods” to something exciting, and arrange the listed species as if they were actors’ names.

  • NounsAndWords@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’ve said it for years, as soon as it’s commercially available I’m getting photoreceptors realignment surgery.

  • SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    6 months ago

    Do I understand correctly that our ancestors had left the water before this upgrade dropped for fish?

    • jsomae@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      that’s not how evolution works. Evolution is not able to produce global maxima, only local maxima.

      • lazyViking@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Not really. Needs is a fairly strict word. If it was needed they would not survive without. Useful, i agree with you