• RageAgainstTheRich@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    ·
    12 days ago

    I am so tired of this shit… every year they try to do this shit again. Every year we again have to convince them not too. Then a year later they try again.

    They will keep trying until they win. Instead of focusing on important things, they just want to push laws for more control. Even our representatives should KNOW that people don’t want this.

    I always wonder that. When we mass call and email to let them know they are wrong on something incredibly obvious. Do they go “oh wow we didn’t know you didn’t want us to know your private conversations or have a list of your favorite porn categories 😲😲😲”? They should already know this.

    • Ulrich@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      They do know. They just don’t care. It’s not for you. It’s to empower themselves. Even if it completely compromises/ends all private communications.

      • SugarCatDestroyer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        12 days ago

        Dear Jack, where and why were you going to send photos of a child’s genitals? Are you a pedophile? And you can’t prove that this organ is yours and not a child’s without shame…

      • RageAgainstTheRich@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        Exactly. And that is why i always feel like these “contact your representative” calls are useless. I will still do it, but it will happen. Maybe not now. Maybe not next time they try. But they will get it through.

        • Ulrich@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          12 days ago

          The last time I contacted a representative they started relentlessly blowing up my phone begging for donations, so I don’t even do that anymore.

    • Korkki@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      12 days ago

      Take note that there are lobbies pushing for these. Security state, police and religious fanatics wanting morality policing, also politicians who re afraid of popular upheaval.

      • RageAgainstTheRich@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        12 days ago

        Maybe if politicians did what the people wanted, they wouldn’t have to be afraid of an uprising against them… and if religious cunts would just stay in their churches and mind their own business…

      • bob_lemon@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        12 days ago

        The biggest lobby pushing this is companies like Thorn, who promise to provide (I.e. sell) the technology required to comply with such a law. It’s literally just a business investment for them.

        • ReluctantZen@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          12 days ago

          Yeah, and, unsurprisingly, the actual experts on child abuse and privacy are mostly against this.

  • ReluctantZen@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    12 days ago

    Fucking hell. When does it stop? It’s gotten shot down multiple times, so why do they keep trying? Do they see more of a chance now that we’re getting more conservative views in the EP? It’s good to see my country opposes it, but man.

    • palordrolap@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      12 days ago

      It never stops. They keep trying and trying and trying until they get what they want. The only time things like this stop is if whatever wouldn’t otherwise stop would inconvenience or take power from people in high places.

      See: Brexit, where an advisory referendum was upheld, but we won’t ever get another one to reverse it, even though that’s a perfectly reasonable thing to want. Too many powerful people would stand to lose out.

    • Humanius@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      Instead it might be more helpful to directly contact your representatives.

      This website can help you figure out who they are, and help formulate an email send to them:
      https://fightchatcontrol.eu/

      (Obviously it is best to write your own response, or at least update the text to be your own, but it could be a good springboard)

      • MudMan@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        12 days ago

        MEPs get elected with proportional representation on closed lists in a nation-wide single district.

        Emailing 60 of them from an array of different parties with no official stance on the issue and no more of a direct relationship with you than with millions of other people is less direct political action and more spam. Pretty sure collective action would have a better chance.

        • Humanius@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          12 days ago

          I’m not sure how contacting my representatives in the European Parliament over something that I am concerned about, would be spam.

          I don’t care what party they are from, or what part of the country they are from. They are still my representatives.
          They sit there to represent the concerns of their constituents in parliament, and they cannot effectively do that if they do not know the concerns of their constituents.

          If you have good ideas for collective action I’d love to hear them, but until then shooting an email can never hurt.

          Edit: Just so there is no confusion, I don’t think signing a four year old change.org petition is any more effective than directly contacting your MEPs

          • MudMan@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            12 days ago

            Well, the EU has a consultation period on new regulations, but I don’t know if that’s open for this specifically.

            Generally, I would say organizations on each country are often the ones with the infrastructure in place to issue a recommendation on these things. Consumer support orgs, unions, privacy groups and so on. Political parties if your country has one with a definite stance on the issue. If you can get those involved and they can get the press involved now you have an avenue for mainstream awareness, which frankly is more likely to do something than a purely online-driven signature or email campaign.

            The rest may differ per country and even per party. It depends on what participation mechanisms you can deploy for each.

            To be clear, I’m not against also reaching out to MEPs, but given how in many places they act as a collective blob representing national partisan interests and how electorally they don’t have a particular incentive to engage with individual voters I don’t know that it’d work best in isolation. I’m not particularly against that, either. “Contact your representative” is a staple of small district, majoritarian, first-past-the-post nonsense and I have no particular desire to move in that direction. I’m way more comfortable with a party-heavy system than with that weirdness.

      • Humanius@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        12 days ago

        Citizen’s Initiatives are great, but I’m not sure they are the right mechanism in this case.

        They are meant to make parliament address a concern, and not to inform legislators how you feel about a law proposal that is already on the table. All a Citizen’s Initiative does is force the European parliament to address a concern if a certain threshold of signatures is met. They will be doing that anyway when the law proposal is being voted on.

        And on top of that, the time frame for a Citizen’s Initiative is too long (over a year) to be a meaningful shield against Chat Control.

        Contacting your representatives to the European Parliament is probably the best way forward at this point.

        • takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          12 days ago

          Perhaps an initiative should be started that introduces a law banning such laws?

          Also I still think contacting your politicians directly (and telling friends and family to do the same) will have better result than change.org petition, but there’s nothing stopping people to do both.

        • SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          12 days ago

          It might be worth making a bid for legislation that requires that the public give up privacy to the government, those in government must make the same information public.

          If they can read my messages, I should be able to read theirs.

  • PastafARRian@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    12 days ago

    Educate friends and family on government surveillance, use privacy tools like Signal, VPN, Tor, etc. Help them set it up. You can do everyday actions to push back far more useful than signing a petition.

    • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      12 days ago

      Until they decide those tools are illegal as well. They solve a different problem. The government will ban things it cannot control so you have to fight governments directly, not just work around them.

      • PastafARRian@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        11 days ago

        We should vote and learn how to shoot. Sign petitions and learn how to use privacy tools.

        When used with a bridge/Snowflake, Tor can bypass government censorship. It works in China for example.

        • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 days ago

          I don’t trust tor. It’s western tech developed by the US and they’ve been caught lying multiple times about security features being removed from tor browser.

          I’m glad it’s there and we should always have multiple options but at this point i2p has more credibility and fewer questionable ties than tor does.

  • AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    11 days ago

    The linked petition says:

    The European Parliament MPs must vote AGAINST Chat Control legislation during EPlenary vote in June-August 2021.

    It’s not even up to date. And it only has 1.8k signatures.

  • fozie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    The European Union has begun to cross the border. I think they were inspired by United States and Signal and etc.