I’m not moving any goalpost. I’m asking for clarification and you’re realizing that your arguments make no sense.
Like now, erosion of privacy… You do realize that EU passed GDPR not so long ago? Which was pretty revolutionary law when it comes to protecting personal data and privacy of its citizens? That many other countries then copied?
But for you the facts (i.e. that EU has one of the most robust data protection and privacy laws in the world) doesn’t matter, in your mind EU is trying to erode privacy and is oppressing its citizens. You will look at the part of the world where people have the most freedom, find a single thing you don’t like and you start talking about oppression. That’s derangement, plain and simple.
I’m not moving any goalpost. I’m asking for clarification and you’re realizing that your arguments make no sense.
Like now, erosion of privacy… You do realize that EU passed GDPR not so long ago? Which was pretty revolutionary law when it comes to protecting personal data and privacy of its citizens? That many other countries then copied?
But for you the facts (i.e. that EU has one of the most robust data protection and privacy laws in the world) doesn’t matter, in your mind EU is trying to erode privacy and is oppressing its citizens. You will look at the part of the world where people have the most freedom, find a single thing you don’t like and you start talking about oppression. That’s derangement, plain and simple.
deleted by creator
EU: very clearly states in the legislation that it has to preserve all the rights granted by GDPR and can’t weaken e2ee in any way
You: oppression!
deleted by creator
Yeah, that goalpost of “what oppression are you talking about?”.
You: EU is an oppressive state!
Me: It’s leading in every possible freedom/free press/human rights index
You: But they are eroding privacy!
Me: They just passed GDPR
You: But they are trying to pass Chat Control now
Me: But Chat Control doesn’t erode privacy
You: Stop moving the goalpost!