• ExLisperA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I agree that $200M is way too much to spend on a LLMs but talking about downloading open source models is completely missing the point. They are not paying for some sort of Grok license so that they can access this amazing model. They are paying for the computational capacity needed to run this model and provide access to thousands of people over some period of time. The alternative here is to simply buy everyone a subscription to OpenAI or something.

    • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      With open source you have the advantage of being able to use different LLMs for different tasks which can be more efficient. Surely Pentagon has access to enough compute power to set this up for a thousand people? The rest is UI, IT and fine tuning by a couple data scientists/programmers trained in LLMs. Surely it is better than Elon who changes his mind on politics every five days and thinks that twenty year olds can run critical government infrastructure because they worship him. Not an expert, just don’t like big tech companies, particularly Melon.

      • ExLisperA
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        compute power to set this up for a thousand people […], UI, IT and fine tuning by a couple data scientists/programmers trained in LLMs.

        Yes, that’s what needed. It’s not just about downloading an open source LLM. That was my point. I see we agree now.