Try NOT II

I was wondering this, feels scary to not NOT for some reason

You Should Know: there are search engines out there that do respect them and factor them in

and +word to include the word in the results

Yes, please dont use GOOG

Added it to my list in the body

I feel like they’re sort of universal to the point if you have to ask that question then what you’re using now (if you’re asking from $ having experience of it not working) isnt worth it and to try a different search engine.

I dont want to say what I use, vut I hope I’m making sense. Just try whatever you are cool using but try examples like with “keyword” or -dontIncludeTerm or +includeTerm

Nice

is the opposite for + like +includeTerm such that includeTerm must be included?

In Soviet Russia, government google yandex you!

Ah, the rare white-breasted tit

I, too, wonder wat a vagina look like in Minecraft

Please, Sir, might I have sum

What is actually soup mode? Like you’re starting to want warmer soupier comfort foods in response to the coolling weather?

Should be $40 billion, disgorgement, then disembowlment, then death sentence for all the fuckers responsible for it and actually running it

Sounds like need a—dare-I-sayit—Chinese wall

Sure…

I would like to look into the companies behind headlines like this. Like who owns them and who decides that these “innocent” little turns of phrase that deign corpos as helpless little victims

Whats with this passive voice shit? Its chooses to layoff, its not hit by shit

Nunnamabizznatch

Curses 🤠

Uniparty