Becoming isolated has literally never helped the US.
As for why hasn’t the immigration system been fixed. Here’s the problem: everyone that goes to Congress has a different idea of how to fix it. And everyone thinks their idea is best. And no one wants to work together and hell no to working with the other side.
Please clean the tab button with rubbing alcohol.
My browser history is fine for most teenagers. The other stuff i use incognito mode.
Never said he’d leave peacefully. In a way I’m hoping he resists
How long before the insanity ends. About two years then we get a new president and we get a new form of insanity.
I think you missed a key point that I was making.
You keep Increasing the area Until you either get to a certain number of people, or to a certain landmass. And I think you missed the word or in there
Let me explain this a different way for you.
Imagine you’re drawing a precinct in the middle of Utah. Obviously not many people live out there. So you’d have a certain amount of land mass that that precinct would cover. And once it gets to a certain amount of size you stop drawing. In other words, you stop increasing the size because it’s covered a certain amount of land mass.
Now imagine you are doing this in downtown New York City. Obviously, you would not be able to cover that much area because you would try to increase the size of the precinct and immediately cover too many people.
So in other words in downtown New York City, your size of your precinct would be smaller because you would hit the population limit for the precinct very quickly. But in Utah out in the middle of nowhere look at a current map of the precincts in Utah it covers a certain amount of land mass, but the very few people are actually in that area. Well, under my proposal when you’re trying to draw the precincts in Utah, they would cover more or less about the same amount of landmass that they currently cover, and then you would stop increasing the size of the precinct. Basically exactly what you have right now in Utah. But instead of oddly drawn precinct, you would have squares and rectangles.
This would not give an arbitrarily larger amount of power to fewer people. What it would actually do is make The way that precinct are drawn, be more fair.
Right now, what happens is Republicans can look in an area and say OK there’s a lot of Democrats in that area so we will do is gerrymander and split up the democratic vote. And they will also shove a ton of people in one area, one precinct, so that way you have eight hour long lines of voting.
What I’m proposing is a control on how many people can be in one precinct. So that way there is no such thing as an eight hour line. The maximum line on average would be about 35 minutes.
Now in places like Utah and Oklahoma the size of the precinct really won’t change very much. Going from what currently is to what I propose. I mean. The only thing that would change is the shape of the precinct out there they would become rectangles and squares.
The only thing this would do is eliminate cheating
So far, no. But that day may be coming
2 k a month is barely above minimum wage. That’s 24k a year. That’s garbage pay. (I’m answering from the point of view off where someone is earning that money in a job).
Having someone give you that is a nice chunk of money. But it gives you an idea of what it actually is worth.
Btw I’m answering as someone in a community of 114,000+ people. We have 4 towns that are shoved together. In this area that money is barely above minimum wage income.
I don’t like wrestling
Organized crime is in basically every single country in the world
I’m hoping that this is fake. And it’s too late for me to look it up right now anyways. I’m tired. I gotta get sleep.
the sky is blue. water is wet. wheels are round. just a few other things that are incredibly obvious. (this is not an attack on op, just a few comments about how obvious the title is)
you would crash the economy . you would have a shit ton of people making a shit ton of money. making all that money basically worthless.
basically it is correct in the U.S.
the line where they stop helping you is low and the line where you can actually make it on your own is above that. so they stop helping you but you have a very difficult time to get to the point where you can actually survive. so you wind up back on social welfare programs (or homeless). the system is broken in the aspect. has been for as long as i’ve been alive (born in the 70’s) .
they need to use a scale and use that scale to help you move out of the welfare programs. so the more you make the less you get, but it isn’t a hard cut off point. and the program needs to have incentives to help you get training to get a job so you don’t need the help.
not very many people want to live on social welfare, they want to fend for themselves but the system is broken in a way that traps people.
as for it being a form of resistance. that i’m not sure what you mean by that. do you mean a form of the people resisting against the government? then no it isn’t a form of resistance.
With that username I have to ask if you are prior service Navy? And I agree with your assessment, it’s a leadership issue.
Any politician who says they are for a data center moratorium. In other words, no new data centers. For a period of at least 10 years while we do an environmental economical and health study I’m voting for.
For the record, I tend to vote, pure democratic line. But if the Republicans came out in favor of this going against data centers. I’m sorry I’d be voting for them. And any politician who knocks on my door or any of their door knockers that they have out here I tell them that. I don’t want to vote for Republicans, but if they’re willing to shut down this madness about data centers in neighborhoods, Or anywhere near neighborhood. Or having private citizen, subsidize electrical power consumption for data centers. I’m voting for that politician.
I don’t have much time for pedos, But if you wanna try vigilanteeism, the only thing that’s gonna happen realistically if you’re going to wind up in prison. Yeah, you might get a few good hits on them or they’ll even kill them. But the end of the day you’re still in jail or prison. So if they’re alive and you beat the shit out of them, now you get stalking charge harassment charge, assault and battery charge. And once you have those charges on your record, good luck on getting a decent paying job. You won’t even get the interviews. Might make feel good, but good luck on paying your bills.
If you killed them now, you’re in jail for murder. Or manslaughter depending on.
Exactly how was that successful? how is that a good thing in any way shape or form? Your life is fucked.
By the way to the original poster, I know you weren’t saying you were going to go do it. This message is really to those who are thinking about doing it. It’s just a stupid idea.
I’m sorry I hurt your feelings. Actually I’m not. 50+ years of watching us over spend because of our addiction to spending. It’s like watching a crack addict beg for another hit.
No idea what an enbie is