SMillerNL

I would be in favour of ray-banning every owner from public life.

Also, do you really want everyone in your wedding photos to be staring at their phone to take pictures?

The decision was made according to the report after the Commission became aware of the group’s existence last month and deemed the risk of compromise too high. While there is no evidence yet that communication has actually been intercepted, the threat situation has escalated.

It’s always been clear Trump had a thing for children. But this is a new low

Well, in that case I guess it’s okay to commit crimes and distort information as an archiving service. Anonymity above all

Which is something you can fight in court, not by committing another crime

And also altered content: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Archive.today_guidance

Not if you ask them it isn’t 😅

What’s to stop people from providing that service to buy people alcohol?

For an implementation to work, it should: * Let the service know that the user is an adult by providing a verifiable proof of adulthood (eg. A proof that’s signed by a trusted authority/government) * Not let the service know any other information about the user besides what they already learn through http or TCP/IP *

Seems like that’s exactly what https://yivi.app/en/ can do.

And he should know…