Generally I believe in helping your opponents. It’s one of the founding principles of the Red Cross as an Organisation and deeply rooted in compassion. However, what seperates fascists from other enemies, throughout history, there haven’t been much cults whose ultimate goal was death. Fascism, or more precise neonazism, is one such cult. It’s end goal can only be the end of the human race. Thus they separate humans in classes within their believe system. They believe it’s necessary to wipe out the „subhumans“. But they to it with the ideology of someone breeding cattle. Do they like their cows? I’d argue so. Will they still kill them. Naturally. A true nazi will be helped, get healthy and still kill their rescuer, because he truly believes it’s for their and everybody’s good to get killed. They view it as an act of necessity or kindness. Goebbels diaries illustrate that. So will I think it’s morally wrong on a momentary level not to help them, in the longer timeframe it’s morally wrong to give those enemies of humankind any type of respite or aid.

Fascists deserve one thing and one thing only: death.

Congratulations! You have reached the next stage of your descent into fascism! Now opponents of the dictator will be shot!

Service information: if you wish to stop fascism before you reach the death camp/ world annihilation stage now, you got to use: Violent and extreme measures against the dictator and his cronies.

That. And also „natural resources“. It really is beyond me how anyone could think that such a comically stupid person should ever be elected in any position.

That’s satire, isn’t it?

Goebbels would be so proud.