You could also say that it chooses what will be the next word it will say to you. It has a few words to choose from, which it has selected in relation to the previously spoken words, your question and previous interactions (the context). The probability you’re talking about (a number) could also be seen as it’s preference among those words. I’m not sure the probability vocabulary/analogy is necessarily the best one. The best might be to not employ any analogy at all, but then you have to dig deeper into the subject to form yourself an informed opinion. This series of videos explains it better than I do : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aircAruvnKk&list=PLZHQObOWTQDNU6R1_67000Dx_ZCJB-3pi

You can have my French’ seal of approval anyway, as long as you like our stinkiest camemberts ^^

I have to admit that’s a pretty uncommon approach. But I guess, the softer the cheese, the freer the cut ! That’s why the infamous cancoillotte is not on the picture ^^

No but you can say “The AI told me to detain them” and not take any responsibility. “I was just answering orders” is sadly too common of an excuse in dooing the worst things…

Aren’t your hands extremely dry from all the washing ?

In the USA. Us Europeans are happily treading toward carbon neutrality, even more since the cheetos’ fun war with Iran.

The Telescreen !

Because that way, humans can teach them gestures. Not saying this is a good thing. EDIT : removed a typo

deleted by creator

Yet

I don’t have any except, maybe, promoting a less biased, more balanced view on any subject. Be it scientific, technological or political. I sometimes like playing the devils advocate when I think it could feed curiosity and critical thinking.

Fake might have been a poor choice of word. I just found it extremely biased and it had very few articles when this one was published. On their footers it reads “FuelArc News is your unbiased source for American automotive news.” When an unbiased view is waived around, I don’t consider it a very good sign toward factuality.

Fair, but you are wrong about me. Explained it in an other answer higher in the comments.

I’m just pointing to the fishiness of the source. I am in no way a Tesla fan. I think the individual electric car is a bad solution to air pollution and global warming. Got a bit more into detail higher up in the comments.

Yes. I’ve answered that higher in the comments.

I live in France and am glad autonomous vehicles are not allowed here. I wish Americans where as protected from private company abuse as we are here. But I stand by the fact that the source does not look trustworthy.

Sorry for answering 9 month later. I never checked my inbox until now.

I was just criticizing the choice of the source, not the facts themselves.

And yes I was moderator on the SpaceX sub for a short while. But I got bored quite fast because there wasn’t anything to moderate.

I am passionate about space exploration and SpaceX is at the forefront of it, whether I or others like them or not. That doesn’t mean I like Musk, his political stance, Tesla’s business goals or any of his other more or less stupid companies. I’m against the privatization of space. I think there should be international regulations against launching satellite constellations and clogging the lower orbit without public approval. I’m also worried about the impact of exponential number of reentries of space junk on the upper atmosphere.

I think the individual electric car is a dumb solution to the issues petrol ones are. Cars take to much place in cities. I don’t own a car and never did. I was born in Paris, France, and lived there most of my life. Dense cities where walking and biking and mass transport is dominant is, in my opinion, the best way to go.

I think Elon is a egomaniac with way to much money and power. I think he is dangerous for democracy and the USA as a whole. I think hyper-loop is a half assed idea, bordering a scam. Boring tunnels for electric cars is the worst idea ever.

So no, I’m not a fan of Musk. Quite the opposite in fact. But you can admire the engineering prowess SpaceX have accomplished without supporting anything it’s oligarchic CEO does or say. Being “with them or against them” is a simplistic take on anyone’s opinions. I hope this clears the waters.

Removed by mod

Removed by mod