• Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 days ago

    Under the regulations, which are set to take effect on Oct. 10, platforms will have to label political ads, disclosing who paid for them, and what campaign, referendum or legislative process they’re connected to

    Oh yeah they sound really unworkable, who could possibly expect meta to take this very basic information from their advertisers and then display it in a small text box.

    Of course not seeing the ads is even better so I don’t think anyone will complain.

  • tarknassus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 days ago

    “I’m sorry to say I cannot accept any more money from disinformation groups political parties, particularly from certain regions* because another region won’t let me put your ads out there for the plebs users to be manipulated informed.”

    * - Russia, China, North Korea, Iran, and other associated places.

    • Babalugats@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      The government parties do. That’s who they’re targeting with this ‘news’.

      Any government party seen bending to the metatwats can fuck off too. But unfortunately they really want the exposure to show the kids how hip they are.

        • Babalugats@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Not all of them, but that’s what meta is trying to get at. “Your laws stop us from marketing you u to the masses”

          Fuck 'em. I hope I live to watch meta crumble to shit and everything like it.

    • kautau@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      “No one”

      They don’t give a shit what their users want. Their users are part of the product they sell. Their customers are their advertisers. This is bad news for political advertisers and their investors, both of whom absolutely want political advertising on the platform. This is a good thing. It would be a much better thing if people would just stop using Meta products altogether

  • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    A fantastic example of why regulation can be good and is often necessary. You can‘t leave tech corporations or even most corporations on their own accord. They need a short leash or they‘re going to tear humanity apart.

  • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    They probably think this will persuade the politicians to review these rules, as they can’t reach their target audiences anymore. I hope they see the overwhelming support for this decision, but I’m not sure if I’m in a bubble. I only see positive reactions so far. There was 1 critical article in the news, but just stating facts, no opinions. I think it’s great. Less brainwashing going on during the election cycles from now on since Facebook in particular allowed for some really specific demographic targeting.

  • FishFace@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    The regulations impose additional requirements for a reason - because political advertising can be extremely dangerous. If it’s a question of no political advertising or opaque, microtargeted political advertising that can’t be investigated later, then it’s an easy choice.