You must log in or register to comment.
that’s the great thing about privacy - its none of ya business
If AI users don’t come out the stigma will never go away.
sucks to be stupid
This is probably relative. A lot of people (smarter and not so smart) got hooked on it because of how accessible and convient it is to just ask AI any question and get it spit an answer in seconds. However, there does seem to be a catch - after some time you feel emptiness / void because of how hollow it is. You don’t seem to need to do a research anymore and critically evaluate the options.
So lazy and stupid?
I’m going to always say this. Only stupid and dumb people love LLMs because it helps them feel smart and artistic.
Hey now, I’m stupid and hate LLMs.
There are dozens of us! Dozens!
Tbh anyone who asks Ai questions and then doesn’t fact check it was never smart. And if you have to fact check it, why not just do the research to begin with and skip the middleman?
deleted by creator
Well there’s also the stupidity of not being able to figure out how to remove the “watermarks” from the generated text…
I’m assuming you think the watermarks are just some hidden characters or something that you can see or remove by pasting into notepad?
Weird Al - Dare to be stupid
The single “code crimes” went way harder than it had any right to!
Using the ai to help find the answers… ok. Using the ai to provide the answers… not ok. You still have to pull up the references or links it gives you and do the research.
Using the ai to help find the answers…
I think this is one of many reasons why search engines became so bad so that using AI could be promoted instead. I have turned to using AI for searching because of it.
I turned to it 2022ish, bingai at the time was the best for finding sources, google was already rough because of promotion and seo shenanigans
Absolutely. You use soemthing like startpage or dogpile and it’s night and fucking day to anything that uses google or google services. Yes i include ddg.
except that those links are increasingly pointing to slop content anyway. Even scientific papers.
On you to learn how to do good dd and weed out the seo slop, ai and/or human made
all of them are just admitting that they’re embarrassed about using AI instead of their own brains. of course, they don’t know that because claude never told them.
i find it funny how some users tried to argue that they did most of the work. it doesnt matter if you did most of the work, everyone as students were supposed to learn to cite your sources. even if you just used claude to reorganize info, theres no reason why you would be against watermarking it unless you wanted to hide the fact you used claude.
While I can appreciate that it’s not a good thing to let AI do your work for you (not just laziness but hallucinations), I can see this is only going to encourage cheaters to use competitors to Claude.
Like Deepseek.
Here’s the support page from Anthropic. Another win from the EU, that’s great! Really curious to read the technical paper about the detection.
I’d be more concerned with how similar the method sounds to glassworm
Would copying it in a text file not work? I mean Christ they are already skipping out on all the work they can’t even copy it?
Its like asking the kid in class to copy his homework and then handing him a pencil and paper so he can copy it for you
Would copying it in a text file not work?
Because doing that doesn’t change the contents of the text so the “watermark” is still there.
Ahhh I understand. So it is the actual usuage of words in a specific order?
Well paraphrasing would probably solve this problem then wouldn’t it? Just paraphrase every line or paragraph saying the same thing but with different words
I was thinking it was an embedded watermark and if you just opened a text file and typed it all out on your own then it wouldn’t flag it
