FoxtrotDeltaTango@sh.itjust.works to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 个月前Why Normal People Aren’t Using AI Agentswww.wired.comexternal-linkmessage-square187linkfedilinkarrow-up1327
arrow-up1327external-linkWhy Normal People Aren’t Using AI Agentswww.wired.comFoxtrotDeltaTango@sh.itjust.works to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 个月前message-square187linkfedilink
minus-squareParlimentOfDoom@piefed.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·1 个月前 half the time Who said all the time? The problem is most people can’t tell which half it’s fucking up. An unreliable tool isn’t useful
minus-squareFranconian_Nomad@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 个月前Hmm. They fuck up 50 percent of the time? I not only doubt that, I know that this is wrong. No offense. Do you actively use LMMs?
minus-squareParlimentOfDoom@piefed.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 个月前No. Because they fuck up so often. Why would I keep using a broken tool?
minus-squareFranconian_Nomad@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 个月前Gotcha. You‘re one of those guys talking out of their arse.
minus-squareParlimentOfDoom@piefed.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 个月前Nope. Just experienced enough to know when the tool is wrong, so I understand it’s a fuck up.
Who said all the time? The problem is most people can’t tell which half it’s fucking up. An unreliable tool isn’t useful
Hmm. They fuck up 50 percent of the time? I not only doubt that, I know that this is wrong. No offense. Do you actively use LMMs?
No. Because they fuck up so often.
Why would I keep using a broken tool?
Gotcha. You‘re one of those guys talking out of their arse.
Nope. Just experienced enough to know when the tool is wrong, so I understand it’s a fuck up.