• naught101@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 month ago

    Sure. Right now, everyone has to make a trade-off between accepting a smaller network and engaging with corporate garbage designed to create rage and clicks. Personally I’m happy to sit on the smaller network and contribute a bit and wait for it to build naturally. That’s why I’m here on Lemmy too.

    • Sylveon@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      My entire point is that this isn’t how it works for me. I use these platforms to keep up with personalities and organisations I care about. Almost none of those are on Mastodon, so it’s just straight-up useless to me. If Bluesky suddenly disappeared and Mastodon stayed exactly the same I wouldn’t switch, I’d just use neither.

        • Sylveon@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          Do you really need me to tell you why I’m not using the nazi pedophile transphobia platform?

          Plus, most people I used to follow there have moved over to Bluesky a long time ago. I would’ve preferred it if everyone moved to Mastodon instead but for now Bluesky is at least acceptable.

          • hirihit640@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 month ago

            So I guess the worry (echoed in this thread as well) is that Bluesky could become the same type of platform, given the people and investors behind it. Only time will tell

            • Sylveon@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              Yes, and I totally share that concern. But for now, Bluesky is pretty good. And if it gets enshittified we’ll hopefully have an easier time convincing people to move to Mastodon.