• luciferofastora@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 month ago

    I hate that I’ve conditioned my own vocab and tone on the same kind of formal writing that these models have been trained on. I’ve used en-dashes long before they became a hallmark of botspeak. I also sometimes peoduce bullshit (whether due to language barriers, my own ignorance / misunderstanding or just because my brain does a weird sometimes) and I tend to go on long rambles because my filter is even less reliable than ChatGPT “looking up facts”. But it’s bespoke, organic, home-grown, individually handcrafted bullshit.

    Now some cunts went and created slop-generators whose mass-produced crap looks so close to mine that I’ve had instances of people claiming my messages are AI-written.

    AI isn’t taking my job, it’s taking my diversion.

        • T156@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 month ago

          To be fair, the Turing Test is ancient. It might just be time for a new test.

          ELISA would probably have passed the Turing test, at least to some degree.

      • luciferofastora@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Lay it on me. Maybe I’ll convince myself that I’m a bot after all. Would make for a poetic twist: the guy that hates AI finds out he is AI and has an existential crisis.

        More seriously, that does raise a good question. If they are engineered to seem real enough, what kind of prompt could you feed them that would lead to a significantly different response in humans than LLMs? Just how do we have to construct Turing Tests in this era?