• NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Privacy first? So what is WhatsApp doing on there?

    I get why, that is for a lot of people the ONLY way they use a phone instead of calling, but this definitely not privacy first or social media free then.

    • zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.comBanned
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      One has nothing to do with the other. A properly configured Android is not going to leak any information to its apps. The problem comes with the customized Android a phone maker uses, where they do everything to gather data (or let others gather data if they pay for it).

      So while the app itself is anything but privacy friendly, the phone is. So is GrapheneOS with WhatsApp.

      • anon_8675309@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        5 months ago

        WhatsApp has access to your plain text before it encrypts it. One has to trust WhatsApp with that. That’s the problem. Meta is untrustworthy.

        • zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.comBanned
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          I did not try to imply that WhatsApp is secure or trustworthy. They will, of course, use as much data as they can. But that’s something out of control of the mobile phone. And if they wouldn’t pre-install WhatsApp, users will download it ASAP.

    • Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’d take some sandbox mechanism for those predatory apps, as it’s a pain living without them (I do, but school, colleges etc don’t).