• TronBronson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Dude… nationalize just means the US takes ownership of the company. They keep all the employees they keep all the customers. It runs like normal under new ownership. The taxpayers now own it. it’s a great idea.

    You see too long we have been using public funding and allowing rich people to privatize the gains. It’s time to privatize those games and take back what we invested in as US citizens. We will still offer you eurocucks Internet since apparently it is more important than having a moral fiber in your body

    • Not a replicant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I didn’t say it was a bad thing, I wanted to know about some of the broader implications, e.g. govt ownership doesn’t remove legal obligations. I doubt the govt could continue to offer service under the previous T&C, some sections would need revision. And Starlink’s T&C are slightly different in some countries, as are the operating conditions. Some countries who are nominally friendly with Starlink/SpaceX to allow ground stations, POPs, etc, might not be so keen on the US govt controlling things.

      These are just some of the things that popped into my head when I read the article.

      • TronBronson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Usually the US government would take over an important business, replace the leadership, stabilize the business and return it to the public sector.

        Elon was tampering with connections in Ukraine during live combat. I’m surprised anyone would trust or want to support one of his businesses. He should’ve been thrown in a black site after that incident.