• Kuinox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I’m someone who use LLM, including Claude Code a lot.
    But come on, this could be a tiny script that do the same, write it with claude code if you dont want to write it, instead of having claude code run each time, you’ll be deterministic this way !

    • kautau@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah this should just be a standard GitHub action. It’s a waste of energy to have an LLM do this over and over.

      I see this trend happening a lot lately, where instead of getting the LLM to write code that does a thing, the LLM is repeatedly asked to do the thing, which leads to it just writing the same or very nearly the same code over and over.

            • Kuinox@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              AI is not the whole cloud, it’s a fraction of the cloud.
              The MIT Press article is from 2022, citing 2019 data. Datacenter tech and heat reuse extremely intensified the last years, so this data is clearly out of date.

              Go explain to these people why “bigger DCs are actually better”:

              Tell me where there is any proof this is meta fault ? Because they are near the datacenter ? Do you have any idea of the amount of water a datacenter consume ?

              • Nate Cox@programming.dev
                cake
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                AI is not the whole cloud, it’s a fraction of the cloud

                And yet it uses so much more energy per capita. This is not like a secret, dude.

                Do you have any idea of the amount of water a datacenter consume ?

                No. Nobody has exact figures because there is a mountain of intentional obfuscation hiding it. We know that it is a tremendous amount of water because we can estimate and we can see the data of towns literally going into extreme droughts right next to data centers, but is is suspiciously difficult to get actual numbers. This should tell you a lot.

                https://www.datacenterdynamics.com/en/analysis/data-center-water-usage-remains-hidden/

                Tell me where there is any proof this is meta fault

                Did… did you not actually watch the video? The video very clearly answers this. Like, multiple times.

                • Kuinox@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  The video very clearly answers this. Like, multiple times.

                  No, they made affirmation, that’s not a proof.
                  For the first location, they say the loss of water pression AND the sediments are due to the datacenter.
                  They are getting their water from a well, if a well runs out, you get more sediments.
                  Is this your “clear answers” ?

                  We know that it is a tremendous amount of water because we can estimate and we can see the data of towns literally going into extreme droughts right next to data centers.

                  If this come from your video again, i again doubt your statements.

                  Datacenters dont make water magically disapear, it have to go somewhere.
                  You would see a release pipe, so the water is restituted, or vapor cloud, which should be very visible.
                  But we dont see any vapor cloud.

  • Colonel Panic@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    this seems overengineered to me - it’s easy enough to have fully automated builds, deployments and releases already. you can even have ai sketch your github actions or similar config. anything beyond that is simply a downgrade or reinventing the wheel. a git commit hook might be just enough