Gen Z has managed something no modern generation pulled off before. After more than a century of steady academic gains, test scores finally went the other direction. For the first time ever, a new generation is officially dumber than the previous one.

The data comes from neuroscientist Jared Cooney Horvath, who has spent years reviewing standardized testing results across age groups. “They’re the first generation in modern history to score lower on standardized academic tests than the one before it,” Horvath told the New York Post. The declines cut across attention, memory, literacy, numeracy, executive function, and general IQ. That’s not just one weak spot. That’s the whole darn dashboard blinking at once.

Horvath took the same message to Capitol Hill during a 2026 Senate hearing on screen time and children. His framing skipped the generational dunking and focused on exposure. “More than half of the time a teenager is awake, half of it is spent staring at a screen,” he told lawmakers. Human learning, he argued, depends on sustained attention and interaction with other people. Endless feeds and condensed content don’t offer either.

  • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    6 days ago

    Gen-X here. Don’t fucking talk shit about our kids. Are they dumber or did they score lower on tests that no longer reflect the ways we interact with modern life?

    • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      They’re measuring lower across all the classical tests designed to measure intelligence. The skills they test for are all very much still needed in modern life.

      • nek0d3r@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        The tests for measuring any intelligence, or for measuring the intelligence of the neurotypical prior generations? Just like the IQ was built around white men, even more modern testing is based on existing bias. We don’t even really have a good baseline for what intelligence is, so a metric claiming to measure it comes with a mountain of salt.

        • Holytimes@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          6 days ago

          Every test no matter how flawed is still fundamentally based on the same general set of skills needed to function as a reasonably intelligent human.

          Critical thinking, problem solving, rationalization, stress management, recall, etc.

          There’s biases in all of the tests and using them to explicitly claim an exact measure of intelligence is dumb as fuck.

          You can explicitly claim if someone’s passing the bare minimum. Cause when you get to the extreme side of failure you are literally getting to the point where your talking about full blown mental and developmental issues. People who need full life long assistance.

          The fact there’s any kind of souls regression towards that end of the scale as a trend is terrifying and should be treated as a major problem.

          This isn’t oh people are just in the spectrum and the tests aren’t fair. Or there’s racism and stuff build in. Cause that would only show a trend in the related groups and can be legitimately accounted for.

          People should not be getting stupider across all demographics. That’s a fundamental failing of humanity. We are actually letting the children down.

    • StarDreamer@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      University “educator” here. There is a dramatic increase in students who are lacking in critical thinking, especially after COVID. I’m not referring to people who just bomb tests, but a complete lack of motivation/ability to do basic things without someone handholding them through the entire process.

      We’re seeing students completely refuse to solve basic equations X = Y + Z for advanced upper div computer science courses, or have trouble setting up a basic C/C++ template with very a detailed Readme guiding people through the whole process. We’re also seeing students zone out and blue screen when being guided through a homework question. (“Here’s the equation, where are the numbers in this question description, what happens if you change XYZ”. This is all being done in bite sized chunks). A lot of people only respond to traditional lecturing in a big hall and cannot/will not respond to any questions/reading materials. In these cases, I believe their standardized testing scores reflect their knowledge level accurately.

      This isn’t to say there aren’t good students. If you look at the overall distribution, there’s still a decent amount of good/smart students. It’s just that test results are no longer showing a bell curve these days. Usually, it’s a bell curve overlapped with a large tail that can consist up to 20-30% of a class.