• Arghblarg@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    145
    ·
    16 days ago

    The cameras worked by constantly recording even before the “record” button was pressed, periodically deleting any footage that hadn’t been intentionally recorded. Once the “record” button was pressed by the officer, it would capture the 30 seconds before the button had been pressed, thanks to this method of constantly being on standby.

    But it was a hard concept for cops to understand. They weren’t being properly trained on the fact that their own cameras didn’t start recording once they pressed record. Hitting that button saved the 30 seconds prior as well, a neat feature that really bit them in the ass.

    Maybe bodycams should randomly record even when the RECORD button isn’t pressed by an officer; and the pre-record time should be random from say 2 minutes to 30 seconds before. And the recording should stop a random 30-60 seconds AFTER they hit ‘STOP’. So they never know when they’re being recorded. If they’re not pulling illegal shit, they shouldn’t have any problem with that, right?

    In fact, with storage capabilities nowadays, bodycams should ALWAYS be recording, period. Gotta go to the bathroom? Too damn bad. You’re a public servant. Trust the auditors to redact that if it comes to a court subpoena. You signed up for it. Extraordinary powers come with extraordinary sacrifices.

    Jeebus Chripes. No wonder so many people say ACAB.

    • cubism_pitta@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      62
      ·
      edit-2
      16 days ago

      When we fly we are forced to let some stranger see our junk with the full body scanner

      Gotta make sure no one is smuggling a full sized tube of tooth paste up their ass

      Seems reasonable given that

    • moakley@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      15 days ago

      I think we just need to revise the laws to say that a cop’s testimony doesn’t have any more weight than anyone else’s testimony unless it’s backed up by their bodycam.

      Taking cops at their word made sense when we didn’t have this technology. It doesn’t make sense anymore.

      • NABDad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        15 days ago

        I keep getting left off jury duty by honestly answering the question about whether I would give less weight to a cops testimony because they’re a cop.

        I suppose if there’s ever a civil jury trial that doesn’t involve a police testimony, I might serve in a jury.

        A bit of a shame because I don’t mind being on a jury. I’m not trying to get out of it. I’m just being honest.

    • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      15 days ago

      The company that sells the cameras and the police buying them don’t want that. The guy who owns the company that makes most body cams advertises that the cameras don’t record more accurately than the human eye. This enables cops to show a blurry 16fps 720p video and go “it looked like he was pulling out a gun”.

    • SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      15 days ago

      Make the record button a pause button. Let it stop for five minutes if you’re not moving. Once you walk away, it automatically resumes, independent of time. If you pressed pause while not in front of the shitter, you’re investigated.

      • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        15 days ago

        Unless you’re going to the bathroom in front of a mirror why does it need to be paused at all?

          • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            15 days ago

            Body cams film people being shot. Body cams film people being dragged out of their beds in their underwear and detained. And we’re clutching our pearls at some farts and groans that no one is going to watch? If you can’t handle someone possibly hearing you fart you shouldn’t be a cop.

            But fine, allow cops to mute the audio. Problem solved.

            If they mute the audio anytime they are not in the bathroom it is assumed they are trying to hide something and the missing audio is assumed to be damaging to the cops testimony.

              • ToTheGraveMyLove@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                14 days ago

                You know there’s an easy fix for that. They can stop being colossal pieces of shit. Putting the impetus on the victims to be better rather than the victimizers is victim blaming 101.

    • big_slap@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 days ago

      Gotta go to the bathroom? Too damn bad. You’re a public servant.

      you lost me here, this is an insane statement. a camera always on even when youre in the bathroom?

      if i was in a public restroom with a police officer, I now have to worry about being on camera in the one place where cameras are illegal? come on…

      • Arghblarg@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        15 days ago

        That might indeed be the result sometimes :). Doesn’t matter. Since the US seems OK with Amazon making their drivers pee in a bottle and docking them points for gazing away while driving, why not make police submit to full recording like this?

    • termaxima@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 days ago

      This would be nice but it ignores the fact cops (like we have today) shouldn’t exist at all. Cops are not the only way to do law enforcement.