• Wispy2891@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    12 days ago

    I don’t understand why the danish officials they even wasted their time to go to Washington to “talk” about this. There’s nothing to talk about this.

    Have they ever tried to reason with a toddler that’s having a tantrum “I want that toy now”? Waste of time.

    • arendjr@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      12 days ago

      Simple: if the toddler has found daddy’s gun because the safe was left open… you better try talking before you scare it.

    • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      They have nothing to lose in doing so.

      At worst “conversations” delay an American invasion giving more time for Denmark to prepare.

      Any half-competent diplomat will ignore “pride” as a consideration for a chance at stopping a war or at least giving their own side’s military more time to prepare, with no actual downside (if that fails they get the exact same outcome as if they didn’t engage in “conversations”).

      Also no doubt a lot of “out of the spotlight” work is going into convicing the members of that Administration who are actually intelligent types putting on a “derranged far-right populist” act for Trump and the American Public, that such a move will indirectly be bad for them personally because of the downsides for the people who own them - big American businesses - of turning Europe into an Enemy rather than merely a trade competitor.

        • CircaV@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 days ago

          And what was the point of trying to reason with a war mongering lunatic? He invaded anyway, France capitulated. Lesson being: you cannot appease dictators and wannabe (for now) invaders. And you should never appease fascists.