• Goodeye8@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    A smaller blade is less dangerous but not safe. You wouldn’t give a 3 year old a multitool with an exposed knife.

    And the second part of the argument was that you don’t need that utility all the time. 99% of the society can get their things done without carrying a knife around.

    Thus someone constantly carrying around a potentially dangerous tool would look weird. I’m sure a hammer would also have great versatility but when you see someone casually lugging a hammer around you wouldn’t find it weird?

    • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      A smaller blade is less dangerous but not safe. You wouldn’t give a 3 year old a multitool with an exposed knife.

      You wouldn’t let a 3 year old cook dinner for himself either. A guy owning an oven is a huge red flag

    • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      You can do 99% of things without carrying a GPS, phone, internet browser, 3 cameras, a compass, an MP3 player, a TV and contents of the Library of Congress around, but no one bats an eye about someone bringing their modern smartphone literally everywhere.