Damn I wish there was a line between ‘hypothesis unsupported’ and publish. Negative results are results too, and now someone else will try it and fail too. So much wasted time, but publishers…

Hypothesis supported -> publish results -> do a little dance -> make a little love -> get down tonight

That’s the most cryptic description of the peer review process I’ve ever read.

Hypothesis seems supported -> Write a draft -> Get your hopes high -> Get fucked by reviewers discrediting your entire field -> Feel down after getting the paper out in 10th round of reviews in the the 5th journal you submitted to

And that’s too much in brief, anyway

This makes no sense. Where is all the masturbation?