Stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 20 hours agoaesthetic rulelemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square46linkfedilinkarrow-up1224
arrow-up1224imageaesthetic rulelemmy.dbzer0.comStamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 20 hours agomessage-square46linkfedilink
minus-squareturdcollector69@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·12 hours agoAccommodating a minority of people who should be more responsible at the expense of posters isn’t good practice. If someone is not ok with potentially seeing NSFW content, which this isn’t, they should not be in a place that has such content to begin with. Nsfw tags suppress posts that aren’t actual NSFW content and remove the value of even having a nsfw tag in the first place. This stance also makes the sub much more vulnerable to brigading if it only takes a relative few complaints to motivate you to censor someone. I appreciate you not removing the post but harassing posters like this kills instances because the complainers don’t post.
Accommodating a minority of people who should be more responsible at the expense of posters isn’t good practice.
If someone is not ok with potentially seeing NSFW content, which this isn’t, they should not be in a place that has such content to begin with.
Nsfw tags suppress posts that aren’t actual NSFW content and remove the value of even having a nsfw tag in the first place.
This stance also makes the sub much more vulnerable to brigading if it only takes a relative few complaints to motivate you to censor someone.
I appreciate you not removing the post but harassing posters like this kills instances because the complainers don’t post.