• Cosmoooooooo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Zero “cities” are debating it at all. The only people debating it are nazis, and it’s not a debate. They’re repeating nazi propaganda, in order to hurt the population. Australia spawned fox and sky nazi propaganda channels, and they’re unendingly spreading nazi propaganda to the world.

    Do something about your nazi problem, Australia.

  • Affidavit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Why change the title? Australia ≠ Queensland

    This is like changing the title of any story about Florida to be about America.

    • Cosmoooooooo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      If something is happening in Florida, it IS happening in America.

      Because Florida is in America.

      Just like Queensland is in Australia, you stupid cunt.

      • JigglySackles@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        BUT just because florida is in America doesn’t mean it is representative of the whole. It seems to be much the same with Queensland and Australia. You stupid cunt.

  • JizzmasterD@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Maybe a meet in the middle solution (even if it’s a misguided emotionally driven recapturing of control movement) is something like:

    « we’ll agree to remove fluoride from the water but in support/exchange we will ban the sale of bottled water in the same areas(or place a prohibitively high tax on their purchase). »

    Since the sources of bottled water are often dubious and unregulated, it’s the best way to reduce the chance that fluoridated water finds its way into the community by bottle and reduces waste at the same time 🤷‍♀️

    Use potential tax savings to subsidize fluoride treatment to families that are interested?