Maybe I misunderstand, but I think that headline is pretty obviously sarcasm.
They are making fun of Russia constantly claiming NATO has declared war on Russia.
So I am honestly a bit confused why this is downvoted? I guess people don’t get the sarcasm, or maybe I’m missing something?Yes the headline was changed “editorialized” by OP, but in essence it’s the same thing.
Saying “you’re trying to kick my ass” is crucially different from “i’m going to kick your ass”
If there’s any sarcasm in the title I can’t find it.
I thought they’ve been at war with NATO?
They have, but now they are REALLY at war with NATO! 😜 😜
This just goes to the MSN website homepage.
Is anyone else getting a comically irrelevant video called “Russian Army vs Europe Combined: A Realistic Military Scenario” from “Binkov’s Battlegrounds” as part of the article (this is with UBO on desktop with a high level of customization)?
This is a very stupid article (in terms of title/framing and content).
No problem since tomorrow rapture will happen.
You mean the raptcha.