Lawmakers and activists across the political spectrum called on American tech firms to stop selling surveillance equipment to Chinese police and for Congress to examine the issue after The Associated Press reported that U.S. technology had played a far greater role than previously known in enabling human rights abuses by Beijing.

Republican Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri told AP he wanted to summon tech companies before Congress to address how their technology exports were used. Hawley, a longtime critic of U.S. technology companies, bemoaned Silicon Valley’s general lack of cooperation with Congress on that and similar inquiries.

“I think eventually we’re going to have to subpoena these people,” Hawley said.

In a post on the social media site X this month, Hawley vowed that “Big Tech must cut ties with the CCP - or face my committee,” referring to the ruling Chinese Communist Party. Hawley sits on several Senate panels that might have jurisdiction to examine technology issues

An AP investigation published this month revealed that U.S. technology companies to a large degree designed and built China’s surveillance state. Firms including IBM, Dell, and Cisco sold billions in technology to Chinese police and government agencies, despite repeated warnings that such tools were being used to quash dissent, persecute religious sects and target minorities. Companies named in AP’s reporting said they complied with all export control laws.

Yang Caiying, who told AP for its investigation about how her family was targeted by Chinese surveillance using American technology because of their activism in rural Jiangsu, said she was “shocked by the pivotal role that major U.S. tech companies have played” in her family’s ordeal. Yang is now collecting signatures for petitions urging Washington to bar U.S. firms from selling to Chinese police, both online and on the street.

Other lawmakers from both parties urged Congress to beef up export laws to prevent more American technology from being used to fuel human rights abuses abroad.

“China has been utilizing partnerships with U.S. tech companies to build malignant ‘smart cities’ that are used for mass surveillance and human rights abuses against millions of innocent Chinese people,” said Rep. John Moolenaar, a Michigan Republican who chairs the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party. The panel is charged with examining the strategic global competition between the U.S. and China.

“As executives at Nvidia and other American tech companies chase business in China, they cannot deny that their technology will be used to commit atrocities, strengthen China, and weaken America,” Moolenaar said.

Moolenaar called for American companies to work with Congress to write new laws that restrict the export of technologies that enable oppression. and work harder to keep their products from being smuggled into China.

  • NoWay@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Cool why don’t you also ask why big tech and Senator Hawley is against the release of the Epstein files?

    • Basic Glitch@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I’m starting to think there’s probably a growing rift between the traditionalists and the technologists, but both sides are in the Epstein files.

      The traditionalists like Mike Johnson are hoping Trump stays in power, and the technologists are hoping JD Vance replaced him.

      For all of his many faults, I think JD Vance might be one of the few people not in the files, but he’s definitely funded by people who are and that’s who’s interests he will always be looking out for.

      I also think Peter Thiel believes as long as his team (Vance, Kahnna, Massie) are in control once the files are released, he can keep his own financial ties to Epstein from receiving too much attention.

      • NoWay@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Only reasons someone has to not release the files is because they are in them or were paid by someone in them. Either way we don’t want anyone in the government not willing to release them.

  • DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    20 hours ago

    “China bAaaD beCaUse cOmMUniSM!”

    Looks Deeper

    Its a State-Capitalist Authoritarian Regime being enabled by another Capitalist Regime, whom itself is also spiraling into a dictstorship

    • Basic Glitch@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      They definitely already are though. That is why they’re trying to cut all regulations on technology.

      There is a private company that got caught doing this in my city and using live facial recognition tech to track people in real time.

      They didn’t even ask for permission they just did it, and the only reason anybody found out about it is bc some journalists at the Washington Post exposed them and published an article about it.

      Police secretly monitored New Orleans with facial recognition cameras

      The cops can provided them with a name and photo and this company will scan cameras all over the city then text an automatic notification of the location to the cops when they get a match

      The picture on the left is one of the cameras in my city