• ccunning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    142
    ·
    1 month ago

    It means Banksy, who has remained anonymous for more than 25 years, could finally be unmasked as he would be required to publicly disclose his name if brought to court.

    Gonna be hard to bring them to court if you don’t even know their name, isn’t it?

    • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      107
      ·
      1 month ago

      With the London surveillance apparatus, I bet they could figure out who Banksy is. It’d be an insane waste of time and resources, but I bet they could.

    • AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      1 month ago

      Seems like an opportunity for a bunch of street artists to show up at court and pull an “I’m Spartacus”.

    • twinnie@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’m pretty sure there’s plenty of people out there who know exactly who Banksy is. It’ll be like with The Stig, all the journalists knew who he was but the mystery was more interesting and sold more papers.

    • Grimy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      He has sold some of his work at auction, I’m guessing they didn’t write a check to “Banksy”.

      • jawa22@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        Banksy has also been to court before, fully represented by his lawyer. The odds of them not knowing precisely who he is are fairly low, I believe.