What are your thoughts? Any counter-counter points to the author’s response to most concerns regarding open source?

  • tabular@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    19 days ago

    Open source can refer to MIT licensed code/projects where it can be taken, modified and redistributed as proprietary software without giving back. You can’t contribute without wondering if you’re doing work for a mega corp.

    I would be temped to argue that doesn’t go far enough. If copyleft wasn’t circumvented by AI I’d argue for that.