• Ferrous@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    15 days ago

    To anyone who gets this: do not let the podiatrist convince you to do the partial removal. Ask your podiatrist if a full nail avulsion could be preferable to a partial avulsion if minimizing chance of reoccurence is the most important factor to you. Ie, removing a tiny strip from one or both sides of the nail. It is HIGHLY likely it will get bad again. Have them do a full phenol cauterization and remove the entire nail. You dont need it, and you’ll be better off without it. However, I’m no doctor.

    • bluespin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      15 days ago

      Also anecodtal: I had the procedure you’re describing and it worked for me. Ignoring your podiatrist is bad advice

      • doughless@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        15 days ago

        I also had that procedure where the doctor only removes the affected part of the toenail. That was over a decade ago and I’ve never had the issue reoccur; and I still have my toenail.

      • Ferrous@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        15 days ago

        Yeah the science is above my head but I believe usually after they rip out the nail (be it whole nail or a strip), they will apply a cotton ball of phenol to the bed and that is supposed to stop the nail from coming back. It failed to do so 3 times in my case, albeit on two different toes.

    • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      15 days ago

      On the flip side, I had partial nail removal on two toes each side, and haven’t had any issues in 20 years. Procedure was quick, mostly painless, and the relief was immediate. I was playing soccer 3 days later.

      If you want to ask about a full removal, go for it, but be open to professional advice.