No. Just no. For many reasons. Don’t be part of the problem. “You would think…” stop there. You don’t need to use conjecture when there is research at your fingertips. Signed - worked in bacterial and viral genetics and vaccine development for decades.
No. Just no. For many reasons. Don’t be part of the problem. “You would think…” stop there. You don’t need to use conjecture when there is research at your fingertips. Signed - worked in bacterial and viral genetics and vaccine development for decades.
so what’s wrong with what they said?
Well, let’s imagine that vaccine antibodies do actually stick around longer for a moment. All right. Who cares?
I could certainly think it was interesting. But concerning? In what way? “Oh no, I accidentally have too much money.” Okay. And?
This is essentially an appeal to nature fallacy. We don’t need to imagine she has a point to make; she’s trying to scare people.
there is no fallacy being committed at all in this thread. and you haven’t explained why this is the case anyway, you’ve only hinted at a hypothesis.
Oh, you’re an anti-vaxxer, huh.
Well, I could say I tried, I guess.
you’ve made a leap of logic. but if that’s what you call trying, maybe we should wait for a real scientist