• 𝕱𝖎𝖗𝖊𝖜𝖎𝖙𝖈𝖍@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    As a FE focused eng with too much industry experience, I refuse to touch any UI that was generated by AI. That sounds like a nightmare. Hell, I refuse to touch any UI that was generated by fucking DreamWeaver.

    One of the hardest challenges in large scale UIs is keeping everything organized and modular. It’s way too easy to write event dependent spaghetti code.

    • squaresinger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      As always AI is ok for doing tiny little things with no dependencies and no plan to use/maintain the thing for a long time. Basically a functional prototype.

      Beyond that it’s useless. As you said, more spaghetti than in an italian restaurant.

      Oh, and never ask an AI to fix the bugs it made. It always fails with that.

  • ebc@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Journalists using LLMs to turn bullet points into a full article

    Readers using LLMs to summarize a full article into a series of bullet points

    • criss_cross@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      My company is experimenting with using LLMs for yearly reviews and it works just like this. We feed in some bullet points of accomplishments and hope the LLM doesn’t fuck it up. Then the manager gets a condensed version down from the summaries.

      Like why bother have the llm in the middle? Can’t I just send data?

      • Revan343@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Like why bother have the llm in the middle?

        To attempt to abstract away actual responsibility for the manager’s decisions