• tinsukE@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    3 days ago

    Love how it highlights that big tech (much to capitalism’s fault, TBH) can only drive innovation if the tech has a moat around it, if no one else can, or would, copy it and deploy it at a lower cost.

    Which is… the argument that people use to defend capitalism? That capitalism drives innovation and makes it accessible to everyone at the lowest possible price.

    I like the frugal tech idea as much as I like degrowth.

    • eldebryn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 days ago

      That’s basically saying that “big tech” (as we know it today) and competition-friendly capitalism just cannot coexist. Which I’m inclined to agree with.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.worldBanned
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 days ago

      Frugal tech idea and degrowth are more capitalist than a handful of monopolies owning you in every orifice and billing you for it.

      If by “capitalism” we don’t mean paleo-industrialism of XIX-century aristocrats with monocles and child labor. If we do mean the “free market with protections for property, rights, safety and anti-monopoly regulations yadda-yadda” moderate-normal-classical model.