• antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    13 days ago

    To minimise the environmental footprint of your own music streaming, use Wi-Fi rather than 4G or 5G. If you listen to a song repeatedly, purchase a download to play. Use localised storage rather than cloud-based systems for all of your music and video files. Reduce auto-play, aimless background streaming or using streaming as a sleep aid by changing the default settings on your device including reducing streaming resolution. And turn your camera off for video calls, as carbon emissions are 25 times more than for audio only.

    Lol no I won’t.

    What a stupid, bizarre and illogical article. It clearly shows that the key is in moving to renewables yet it still argues for the users also doing this sort of tiny useless gestures. I suspect it’s AI-written at least in part.

    • InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      13 days ago

      Use localised storage rather than cloud-based systems for all of your music and video files

      This is good advice tho. I also chose to read it as a Spotify endorsement of the high seas ;)

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      13 days ago

      The devices they’re talking about are also still turned on. The power usage of the network requests is incredibly small. Switching from cellular to wifi will make the biggest difference, but who the hell isn’t already on their home wifi network? Plus, at least me personally, I have my liked songs downloaded on Spotify to save data usage. I suspect others may as well.

      This is like the folks worrying about the water usage of AI. Environmental concerns are a real problem and there are tons of things to focus on, but they pick such a weirdly specific, negligible, non-issue.

  • nivenkos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    14 days ago

    And carting CDs and vinyl around used a lot more energy still.

    We should focus on increasing renewable energy production, not degrowth.

  • paraphrand@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    These companies will use the lowest possible bitrate with the newest possible codecs to balance quality and bandwidth. They will also default to a medium quality when it comes to picking audio quality.

    I’d say they are doing their best already just to save bandwidth costs.

    Just look at YouTube and how they set the video quality (resolution) as low as they can get away with.

  • Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    13 days ago

    I never really had much interest in music streaming services, given the wealth of storage on modern devices, and the ease of ripping audio from almost any source in existence.

    Do we need a constant internet connection to listen to music? Is it that hard to use VLC, and just buy/download what you want, and rip what you can’t?

    • FurryMemesAccount@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      13 days ago

      Using VLC is easy. Having good musical taste and finding the time to renew your library so it doesn’t grow stale is hard.

      I know, I used to download all my stuff and now I just get YouTube music started on a piece I like and let it autoplay forever while I work, do a tabletop campaign, play videogames… I find that this way, I find the music it plays to be in the right mood 98% of the time.

      It disgusts me to say it but it just works and saves me a lot of time.

      • Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 days ago

        I guess a big factor would be constant access to the internet on your mobile devices. I usually travel through internet “dead zones” (no cell coverage, wifi, or just in a building that doubles as a Faraday cage), so I find having offline music a lifeline for staving off boredom. That could be why it appeals to me more - plus the whole “they can’t take it away” side.

    • Samskara@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      13 days ago

      Music discovery is the greatest feature besides having most music available without having to rip it first. Shared playlists are fantastic as well. The platforms automatically recommend music for you, can play music similar to one song you like, and so on.

      How do you share a curated playlist of songs with someone else without something like Spotify?

  • Axum@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    13 days ago

    As if this fucking matters all while the ai hype literally spins up power plants just to handle the energy usage

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 days ago

      It’s so so frustrating. AI is cool, I get it, LLMs are impressive, but we’re in such a bubble right now. Every company is like “damn, that other company is doing a cool thing with AI, we need to make sure our shareholders think we’re doing cool things with AI too!” So they make flashy AI things and it feeds back into the cycle because obviously other companies and their shareholders see it, because these companies are publicly traded.