• tootoughtoremember@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Why does it have to be him? Couldn’t there be one dove in the “liberal” main stream media asking those questions, rather than manufacturing consent for endless war?

    • SassyRamen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      6 days ago

      He follows Putins orders, he’s a part of the ruZZian media arm in America. You know… a god damn traitor, that needs a new neck tie.

      • StarryPhoenix97@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        6 days ago

        That makes sense. It’s funny how people have forgotten the women’s protests of a few years ago and are quick to jump to Iran’s defense. They may not be the aggressors but as a country they aren’t innocent. They have their problems. Russia trying to get their hegemony makes sense.

          • StarryPhoenix97@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            Yeah it’s too bad the phrase “both sides” has become another trigger term for people. You legitimately can’t say anything anymore. Tribalism is a real problem online. You used to be able to have opinions that differered from other people. On principle I understand wanting to advocate for human rights. But bad actors have turned what should be a forum for discussion into what amounts to a binary rap battle. It’s online gang warfare that’s been cultivated to stop communication and growth. It’s gross. Life is complicated and we can’t always be right but we can always try our best.