stephen01king

Try asking the guy to criticise Israel for all the civilians they’ve killed and you may find that it’s actually not that easy, which is strange, right?

Dang, they’ve really been preparing for this for a while, haven’t they. A lot more than I can say for the Trump administration.

Checking if the person I’m accusing of being a leftist is a leftist first before posting the comment is not pretending to do research, it’s simply common sense.

You somehow think that making comments involves either peer-reviewed science or zero research at all and nothing in between. You also seem to be proud of not double-checking your assumptions at all. From these two observations, I can tell that you have a few issues up there that needs to be addressed.

No, I simply recognise what I perceive may not be the same as reality and would double check my assumptions before posting any comment so I do less mistakes. I especially do not proudly proclaim that my comments lack any research whatsoever and that I’m completely fine with it like you are doing.

So you’re making assumptions based on your flawed and biased experience instead of factual data. Got it. I expected that given the quality of comment you provided above.

I’m also amazed at how quickly you blame leftists based on one person’s comment that gave no indication that they are a leftist.

This comment is why I can’t take you at your word when you say you’re against all civilian deaths.

Not only do you not have any proof to give, which might be explainable by you not getting the chance to make such a comment just yet. But instead of simply explaining why and using this chance to call out Israel for their atrocities against civilians, you decided to focus on one part of the comment so you can avoid criticising Israel while claiming the moral high ground.

This is a very typical Zionist tactic which is convincing me more and more that you are not arguing in good faith. I can still be wrong, but you’re not making it easy for me to trust you.

And you’re making this assertion based on which data?

Do you classify them as an untrustworthy source when it doesn’t conform to your world view? I treat them as a source that I compare with other sources.

Do you know how polls are made? 500 people is enough to get an insight into the trends inside a population. There are other factors that affect the accuracy more than having more people surveyed. You’re free to analyze their methodology and come up with an argument for why it invalidates the result.

Like I said, they are more likely to have been Zionists than anti-Zionists, given the proof I’ve provided. Never did I claim they all are Zionists. I also never even claimed murdering civilians is a positive thing. All I did was disprove your claim that the anti-Zionists sentiment here are caused by antisemitism.

Also, you avoided giving proof that you had made comments calling out Israel for killing civilians in multiple countries when the other guy asked for it, so forgive me for doubting your position that you are against all civilian death. The way you argue are far too reminiscent to the way Zionists do for me to take your word for it.

There are polls showing the majority of Israelis consider themselves Zionists. For example.

I want to say you’re just uninformed, but I’m way too used to the way Zionists argue to recognise when they are just acting like they don’t know so they can make false arguments that aren’t based on any facts.

In this case, all the victims are disproportionately Zionists, so what you’re claiming is the less likely thing to be happening here. It’s also very transparent when Zionists try to hide behind the Jew identity so they can avoid consequences for their actions, you know?

Well, maybe people would actually realise how much the US has turned into a fascist nation and stop going there. And maybe the Americans who are wealthy enough to travel overseas can no longer overlook how bad their country had become if they have to deal with ICE, instead.

In this specific conflict, one of them was not the aggressor, so I am still on their side within that specific context. They’re still a horrible regime, though.

It’s an easy source of nutrition. Why wouldn’t you gobble up some chicks?

You think I’m talking only about the Trump administration exclusively? ICE has been a thing since the Obama days, and the mistreatment of illegal immigrants happen even under a Democrat administration, even if they are much less severe.

I’m sorry to say this, but the current situation is just the result of decades of American resistance against multiculturalism, which no doubt, is mostly pushed by right-wing ideologies, but they certainly weren’t getting enough pushback from the Democrats, either.

If as you say that on-the-ground, multiculturalism is still embraced in America by the majority, your political class certainly does not reflect that. In that case, you should probably focus on fixing the fact that your politics do not reflect the opinions of the majority of Americans before trying to fix anything else.

That’s because you refuse to listen to anything that doesn’t fit your worldview. Very American of you.

Nope, the reason ICE exists is BECAUSE many Americans are resisting against multiculturalism. They are proof that multiculturalism is no longer part of US culture. You guys can disprove that by actually abolishing ICE. Until then, you can’t convince me that multiculturalism is still part of your culture while a big portion of your people voted against it.

I don’t know how you come up with that conclusion.

Not anymore with ICE still free to do what it wants.