

They claim it is an open-source model but at least for now it has a custom unspecified license. I hope they change that before the actual release because right now I wouldn’t even call it open-weight
I’m just here for the moral superiority.🌱
Mainly interested in FOSS
Currently in uni and working part-time as a developer and system administrator.
PC Specs
CPU: 7800X3D
GPU: 7900XTX
Memory: 64GB
System: Arch


They claim it is an open-source model but at least for now it has a custom unspecified license. I hope they change that before the actual release because right now I wouldn’t even call it open-weight


You can also contribute to OpenStreetMap in your area using simple apps like StreetComplete or EveryDoor. This has a way lower barrier to entry than contributing code in my opinion. And it has the immediate benefit of a better local map for a LOT of services that are built on top of OSM.


I’m no expert, but basically the way to unlock higher/full bandwidth for HDMI 2.1. This will allow the use of higher refresh rate, resolution, and bit depth + HDR. Right now you need to make sacrifices in at least one category with HDMI


What is the difference between this implementation and the reverse engineered patches that were published a few months ago by Michał Kopeć and Tomasz Pakuła?
Edit: apparently it’s not the same patch, but Tomasz was CC’ed in the patch set so the timing might not be accidental.


I’m European and had to do the same, so it’s based on something else.
The concept seems pretty clear to me from a quick look on wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sentience
Also further down:
And if you don’t like wikipedia here is the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy