Yeah ok but you’re not scrolling your wall for hours a day, right?

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

On the other hand, most democracies come from military coups. All the recent coups leading to authoritarianism come from the CIA or Kremlin or Islamism. After the cold war more coups led to democracy afain. If the US has an internal coup now it’ll be more likely one of those, I’d think.

You sign NDAs with your testers and prototypers for that.

The problem is false negatives. Positive reports would still be reviewed before treatment.

AI already has less false negatives than humans. Both together is optimal but at some point you need to prioritize. A doctor looking at scans could in stead be treating a patient.

This is not about genAI. It’s cheap old technology. It’s been better than humans for a while now. The problem is legal risks.

Population is a statistical term which means “everything”. There is no “next 100”.

The 300 number is specifically about very big populations where you’re trying to measure something like an average of an unknown variable. It doesn’t apply to just anything statistics.

How big do you think the population of people with AI delusion is? Why can’t 19 be a representative sample? Why is that not enough to make statements like “after the user expresses romantic interest in the chatbot, the chatbot is 7.4x more likely to express romantic interest in the next three messages, and 3.9x more likely to claim or imply sentience in the next three messages.” when all 19 users expressed romantic interest?

That doesn’t make sense. What if your population is only 100?

Wat

They’re compiled rust programs.

You can fork today. It’ll work forever.

They were not competing before? Astral’s product is private package repo’s. Maybe that will get abandoned but the FOSS projects are safe.

How are they competition? Astral’s tools solve the same problems for humans and AI.

Every American living abroad gets questioned about their views on Trump.

Radical means root (like in radishes). More radical means more focused on roots of the movement/core values. It has nothing to do with extremism per se. It’s trough overuse in propaganda, “radical extremist” started sounding like a tautology.

Stupid reason. Burger used to mean pork and beef. There were laws for this. Now we have chicken burgers?? Yeah nobody cares.